Twelve players. Five nights. Two courses. You opened the file on Monday morning and you are now on email fourteen.<\/p>\n
The resort came back yesterday with a rate that expires on Friday. The course sent last year’s greenfee grid. The ground handler wants flight numbers that do not exist yet, because the client will not buy tickets until you give him a price.<\/p>\n
You close the laptop. The group will go. You will make it go, the way you always do.<\/p>\n
What you have not worked out is what it pays you. That is the gap: golf group profitability<\/strong> is in none of those fourteen replies.<\/p>\n By the end of this piece you will be able to run a one minute calculation on your last group. Fair warning. Most operators who run it do not enjoy the answer.<\/p>\n Your costing sheet measures one thing. Selling price minus cost. That is your number.<\/p>\n And that number usually looks strong. A golf GIT carries a high average booking value, extra nights, extra rounds, extra spend on the ground. Set against a beach week, the gross commission is the envy of the programme.<\/p>\n Which is exactly why nobody investigates it.<\/p>\n What the sheet has no column for is handling time. And the handling time on a golf group looks nothing like the handling time on anything else you sell.<\/p>\n A city break is two emails and a confirmation. A cruise is a form. A golf group is nine suppliers on nine different response cycles, and not one of them comes back the same day.<\/p>\n The margin sits in the sheet. The cost sits in your calendar.<\/p>\n Take your last golf group. The one that travelled, not the one that collapsed.<\/p>\n Write down what it actually left you. Gross commission, less the handling you never invoiced: the Saturday phone call, the room change, the player who dropped out ten days before departure.<\/p>\n Now write down the hours. All of them. Costing, chasing, reconfirming, and the organiser messaging you at eleven at night.<\/p>\n Divide.<\/p>\n Round numbers, so the shape is visible. Twelve players, five nights, two courses. Twenty six thousand pounds of business. Twelve per cent commission. Three thousand one hundred and twenty pounds. That reads like a good week.<\/p>\n Now the hours.<\/p>\n Six on costing and recosting, because the group grew from ten rooms to twelve and the rate band changed. Four chasing tee time confirmations. Three on rooming lists, name changes and misspellings. Two on transfers. Three following the organiser from deposit to departure. Two on post travel invoicing and one small complaint.<\/p>\n Twenty hours. Around one hundred and fifty six pounds an hour.<\/p>\n Then the uncomfortable part. That is if the group travels. If it collapses in October, you have already paid for those twenty hours yourself.<\/p>\n Now factor in the groups you quote and never close. I am not going to invent a sector average for you, but you know yours. Close one in three and your one hundred and fifty six pounds an hour becomes fifty two.<\/p>\n Fifty two pounds an hour on the most expensive product in your programme.<\/p>\n When an operator runs this calculation for the first time, the surprise is almost always the same. They assumed the time went into selling. It goes into waiting.<\/p>\n These are the four leaks I see most.<\/p>\n The recost.<\/strong> The group grows by two rooms, which is the best news you will get all month, and you find the rate you already quoted does not apply above ten. Back to the hotel. Back to the client. An awkward conversation thrown in free.<\/p>\n The silence.<\/strong> You ask for availability on Tuesday and hear back on Friday. You have not worked, but you have not been able to close either. That gap appears on no timesheet anywhere, and it is precisely where groups are lost. Operators rarely lose a booking on price. They lose it on three days of nothing.<\/p>\n What you did not know to ask.<\/strong> That the club takes no outside players on Fridays. That caddies are compulsory, sit outside the package and are settled in cash. That the date is not sold out, it is closed to arrivals, and moving the inbound by twenty four hours lets the whole group in. Every missing detail is a three day round trip by email.<\/p>\n After the trip.<\/strong> The charge that lands four months later for a no show nobody flagged. That is not selling time. That is arguing time.<\/p>\n Here is the second thing the calculation exposes. Selling price does not predict profitability. Group type does.<\/p>\n The repeat GIT is the strongest by a distance. Same organiser, same destination, same week as last year. The second time costs you a third of the hours and pays the identical commission.<\/p>\n The mixed group with non playing partners is the one most likely to die at home, before it ever reaches you. Not because golf is expensive, but because the person who does not play cannot picture four days of their own. If you are building those, the mixed handicap problem is worth reading on its own<\/a>.<\/p>\n Then there is FIT, which most operators ignore while chasing groups. A single tee time is one email. No rooming list, no transfers, no dropouts, no organiser. Per minute invested it is the most profitable golf you will sell, and it is usually the way into a corporate client who brings you eleven more next year.<\/p>\n This is where most people reach for the wrong control.<\/p>\n The group hesitates, the organiser says it is over budget, and you do the one thing you can do on your own. You give away commission.<\/p>\n The booking lands. Congratulations. You have just sold more and earned less, and the twenty hours are still sitting exactly where they were.<\/p>\n Discounting does not improve golf group profitability. It damages the numerator of the calculation you just ran and leaves the denominator untouched.<\/p>\n The lever is not price. It is the denominator.<\/p>\n You can use this on the next enquiry that lands. Seven questions answered before the costing sheet opens. With all seven on the table, a group drops from twenty hours to under eight.<\/p>\n You negotiate greenfees. You negotiate rooms. You negotiate override.<\/p>\n You have probably never negotiated a response time, and it is the line with the biggest effect on what a golf group pays you.<\/p>\n Run it through the calculation. A supplier who answers in twenty four hours instead of seventy two takes roughly a third out of your handling on every group, every year, on every destination they cover. Two extra points of commission does not come close to that.<\/p>\n So put it in the conversation. Ask what the turnaround is on availability, on rooming changes, on a Sunday problem in resort. Then hold them to it.<\/p>\n Rack rates are published. Turnaround is not, and it is the one nobody makes you fight for.<\/p>\n A product manager at a UK operator wrote to me in June. Not to ask for rates. To tell me the high end villas were something he had \u00abin mind for the future\u00bb. His colleague had left and he was carrying two portfolios.<\/p>\n In mind for the future means nowhere.<\/p>\n He had not shelved the expensive product because it does not sell. He had shelved it because there are not enough hours in his week.<\/p>\n On that calendar, the product that sells itself beats the product you have to assemble. Every time. Even when the second one pays three times as much. That is not a failure of judgement, it is arithmetic.<\/p>\n What I do with operators is take hours out of the calculation. One person across five destinations, rates that survive a group growing, and the operational answers handed over before you have to ask for them. You keep the client, the brand and the margin. You drop the chasing. That is how I work with agents and tour operators<\/a>, and this is what a group programme looks like<\/a> once it is already built.<\/p>\n One more thing, and it is worth saying plainly. If you sell golf at all, you are already handling the hardest trip in your programme. Nobody takes on a golf group because it is easy. What you are short of is not judgement. It is hours.<\/p>\n Net commission, divided by real hours, adjusted for the groups you costed and never closed.<\/p>\n If that number comes in below what a beach week pays you, the problem is not the destination. The problem is the assembly.<\/p>\nWhy golf group profitability never reaches your margin sheet<\/h2>\n
Divide the commission by the hours<\/h2>\n
The four places the hours actually go<\/h2>\n
Not every golf group pays you the same<\/h2>\n
Discounting is the wrong lever<\/h2>\n
Seven questions before you accept a golf group<\/h2>\n
\n
Response time is the rate you never negotiate<\/h2>\n
What changes when the assembly is not yours<\/h2>\n
Run the numbers on your last group<\/h2>\n